Explained; Desisyon ng Korte sa Drug Possession case ni Remulla III

Juanito Jose Remulla III Case; Explained 

 

The Las Piñas Regional Trial Court (RTC) has acquitted Juanito Jose Remulla III, the 38-year-old son of Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary Jesus Remulla, of drug charges for possession of high-grade marijuana worth around PHP1.3 million. 

JUNKED. The marijuana bags seized during a Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency anti-narcotics operation that resulted in Juanito Jose Remulla III's arrest in October 2022. The court noted that the prosecution failed to present evidence that the accused was aware the parcel he received contained marijuana and raised concerns about the package's chain of custody. (Courtesy of PDEA) 

 

The prosecution failed to present evidence that the accused knew the parcel he received contained marijuana, and the court also raised concerns about the chain of custody of the package, which was held for days before being turned over to the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) on Oct. 10, 2022. 

 

Read more HERE

Watch full video:

https://fb.watch/hV-_PKtKqj/

https://fb.watch/hV-_PKtKqj/

 

Advertising

Scroll to continue 

Recommended Bar Review Materials in Remedial Law 📚

 

THE REVISED PENAL CODE, BOOK I & II estrada 

 

Riano CivPro Vol. 1 (2022) - Civil Procedure Rules 1-56 Volume I Bar Lecture Series by Dean Willard (+) 

 

Civil Procedure (The Bar Lecturer Series) VOL. II. (2022 Ed.) by Dean Willard (+)

 

EVIDENCE (2022 Ed.) by Dean Willard (+)

 

The Revised Rules of Court Codal (Pocket-Size) 2022 by CBSI Editorial Staff [Hardcover]  

 

UP Law Complex. ANSWER TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTION IN REMEDIAL LAW 1997-2018 

 

Questions & Answers of 2005-2021 Supreme Court Decisions in Remedial Law (2022 edition) 

 

Emilio Llanes (2016) - Legal Maxims with Latin Proverbs, A Compilation of - Law Book

 

The reaction of the younger Remulla; consistent with human experiences. 

The court weighed the testimony of Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency agents Eduardo Bongao Jr. and Clint Mek-eng, who both stated that when the marijuana-containing parcel was delivered to the younger Remulla, he stated that he did not expect any package to be delivered to his residence. 

 

This Court held: 

 

“His reactions were consistent with a person who was not expecting a parcel or a package from a certain Benjamin Huffman or from any other person for that matter. They are likewise consistent with a person who is oblivious to the parcel’s contents,”

 

 

Chain of custody "compromised."

According to the court, the prosecution failed to show that measures were taken to prevent the package and its contents from being taken into possession by someone outside the chain of custody before the parcel was given to the PDEA.

 

Related 

Read: Remulla Case: Nothing Irregular With Speedy Disposition. 

“These people cannot understand, they really do not know the law and the guidelines of the Supreme Court on continuous trial.”

- Defense team.

✍️ @PhilJuris | Lodpost Writers BUDDY 

What are your thoughts on the Court's decision in this case? Leave a comment below and sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

Enjoyed this article? Stay informed by joining our newsletter!

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Author

Veritas vos liberabit.