SMNI Media News, a media organization known for its perceived bias and support of the Duterte Administration, has been facing significant challenges under the Marcos Administration. The network has been vocal about terrorism activities attributed to the New People's Army (NPA) and has uncovered several secrets related to the group. As a result, SMNI now faces possible suspension and the potential cancellation or suspension of its franchise. However, SMNI's lawyers argue that the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) is utilizing its power to suppress the network due to its critical stance against the Marcos Administration. This article delves into the ongoing controversy surrounding SMNI and the concerns raised about the balance and fairness of the case.
The NTC's Role and Jay Sonza's Criticism:
According to Jay Sonza, a Duterte supporter and former media news caster, the NTC plays multiple roles in the case against SMNI. Sonza claims that the NTC is not only the complainant but also acts as the prosecution, judge, and executioner, raising questions about the fairness and impartiality of the proceedings. Sonza's Facebook post sheds light on the concerns surrounding the regulatory body's influence over the fate of SMNI.
Suspension of SMNI Programs:
In addition to the challenges posed by the NTC, SMNI has also faced program suspensions by the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB), the department responsible for overseeing television programs. One of the suspended programs is "Gikan sa Masa, para sa Masa," hosted by former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte. This show focuses on discussing various issues in the Philippines and provides the former president's perspective, often criticizing public officials for their alleged wrongdoings. Another suspended program is "Laban Kasama ang Bayan," hosted by Eric Celiz, a former high-ranking member of the CPP-NDF-NPA, and Loraine Badoy, a vocal advocate for countering terrorism, particularly the New People's Army.
The Threat Perception and Suppression:
The Duterte administration, SMNI, Loraine Badoy, and Eric Celiz have all been seen as threats to the current government due to their outspoken criticism. SMNI has been accused of disseminating news that the administration deems unfavorable or that aims to influence public opinion against the government. This perceived lack of control by the administration has led to the suppression of SMNI's operations and programs.
Conclusion:
The challenges faced by SMNI Media News under the Marcos Administration highlight the complex relationship between media organizations, regulatory bodies, and the government. The network's alleged bias and support for the previous administration have resulted in a contentious situation, with concerns about the fairness of the case raised by Jay Sonza and others. The suspension of SMNI programs further adds to the controversy, indicating a broader effort to stifle criticism and control the narrative. As the situation unfolds, the future of SMNI and its role in reporting news critical of the government remains uncertain.
You must be logged in to post a comment.